+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: This is too easy ...

  1. This is too easy ...

    A rant section on a bulletin board - this is going to be fun.

    Things I can't stand ...

    Reality TV.
    Dumb TV in general.

    People who cause door dings.
    People who don't know which side of a door to pass though.
    People who are always in a hurry.
    People who don't take pride in their work.

    Sniping on eBay.
    Parting out working systems on eBay.

    Inconsistencies in foreign policy.
    Inconsistencies in domestic policy.


    There, that should get some traffic going ... : - )

  2. Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Back of Burke (Guday!), Australia
    Posts
    2,601

    Re: This is too easy ...

    "mbbrutman" wrote in message:

    > A rant section on a bulletin board - this is going to be fun.

    Yes, this might be going to be the busyiest section in the
    messageboard.

    > Things I can't stand ...

    > Reality TV.
    > Dumb TV in general.

    Ditto! I suppose you hate people saying ditto? :-(

    > People who cause door dings.
    > People who don't know which side of a door to pass though.

    Even when there locked?

    > People who are always in a hurry.

    I hate that too. But probably for a different reason!

    > People who don't take pride in their work.

    That's not me.

    > Sniping on eBay.
    > Parting out working systems on eBay.

    > Inconsistencies in foreign policy.
    > Inconsistencies in domestic policy.


    > There, that should get some traffic going ... : - )

    Geez, I think there might be some flaming about
    to happen here!

    Regards.

  3. A locked door is a barrier, so that immediately changes the problem domain ..

    Apparently if we want some traffic, we're going to have to ask the question:

    What is the best operating system?



    DOS 2.1 of course!!



    (woohooo!)

  4. Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Back of Burke (Guday!), Australia
    Posts
    2,601

    "mbbrutman" wrote in message:

    > A locked door is a barrier, so that immediately changes the
    > problem domain ..

    > Apparently if we want some traffic, we're going to have to ask
    > the question:

    > What is the best operating system?



    > DOS 2.1 of course!!



    (woohooo!)

    My name suggests otherwise! ;-)

    Though I just some ol' nut who has
    CP/M on their 8bit & IBM computers! :-)

    Regards.

  5. I gotta corner you and chat sometime ..

    How are you running CPM on the PCs? Are you using CPM 86, or are you using a Nec V20 and running the Z80 version of it?

    I've long thought about taking CPM for a test drive. Heck, even C64s can do it with the Z80 chip on the cartridge.

    (Crap, this isn't a rant ...)

  6. Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Back of Burke (Guday!), Australia
    Posts
    2,601

    "mbbrutman" wrote in message:

    > I gotta corner you and chat sometime ..

    > How are you running CP/M on the PCs? Are you using CP/M-86,
    > or are you using a Nec V20 and running the Z80 version of it?

    No, I'm not using a NEC V20 chip. I'm using a modified version
    of CP/M-86 v1.1 (written for the PC/XT originally) which was
    modified to work on 286s/386s/486s/Pentiums, etc, etc.

    There have also been many enhancements (some which I don't
    use), such as support for 720kb & 1.44Mb & 1.2 Mb floppy
    disks, a Ramdisk which uses the extended memory in the
    computer (up to 15Mb I think), support for partitions on new &
    large Hard disk spaces (there was a problem where the OS
    only originally allowed an 8mb hard disk partition, because
    of the size of really big hard disks nowadays, this is really
    involved & can't quite explain all this to you) & there is a
    program which allows you to have more than 8mb under
    CP/M-86 (upto 120Mb I believe). But I don't use the Hard
    Disk routines, since I think I have enough & get by without
    them. I also think that 8mb is plenty for a system like CP/M-86.
    I only have a 4Mb partition & think it's plentiful for what I do!
    :-)

    > I've long thought about taking CP/M for a test drive. Heck, even
    > C64s can do it with the Z80 chip on the cartridge.

    It can, but the results aren't too impressive from what I've heard. :-(

    (Crap, this isn't a rant ...)

    Erik will just move us to the CP/M section, if he thinks we're off-topic
    here! :-) But if you want to rant on about the C64! :-)

  7. What is the best operating system?

    My .02, CP/M 2.2 of course. It's the first OS I ever used, and the last one I ever understood. Having access to source code helped a lot, too.
    Jam the computer...trash every lethal machine in the land! --Timothy Leary
    _____________________________________________

    Please visit the Vintage-Computer Wiki. Contributers welcome.

  8. Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Back of Burke (Guday!), Australia
    Posts
    2,601

    "Terry Yager" wrote in message:

    > What is the best operating system?

    > My .02, CP/M 2.2 of course. It's the
    > first OS I ever used, and the last one
    > I ever understood. Having access to
    > source code helped a lot, too.

    On the IBM I use CP/M-86 v1.1 (which
    is the 16bit version of CP/M 2.2!).
    Programming it is great! :-)
    On my Amstrad I like programming
    CP/M 2.2 because it's so much easier
    than CP/M Plus, which messes around
    with the extra 64k (on my 128k
    machine).

    Some jokers in alt.folklore.computers
    think that CP/M 2.2 is a bloated OS,
    but everything would seem bloated to
    them if they are using CP/M 1.x! :-(

    Cheers.

  9. Yesw, I have played around with CP/M 86 and even CCP/m 86. It;s nice, but, no source code. Do you have any?

    --T
    Jam the computer...trash every lethal machine in the land! --Timothy Leary
    _____________________________________________

    Please visit the Vintage-Computer Wiki. Contributers welcome.

  10. Quote Originally Posted by mbbrutman
    DOS 2.1 of course!!(woohooo!)
    Ooh, BBC Master 512 memories ahoy! That ran DOS 2.1 on the 80186 co-processor thingy. Dunno how well, though...

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts